Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Renovation Blog
Condo for rent or lease
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Truck for Sale
Reconstruction Blog
|
Culture & Politics » cn.bbs.soc.house » ÉùÔ®ÍõÎÄâù©¤©¤ÃÀ¹úÊÐÃñ¸ø¸Ã°¸·¨¹ÙµÄÒ»·âÐÅ
| ÉùÔ®ÍõÎÄâù©¤©¤ÃÀ¹úÊÐÃñ¸ø¸Ã°¸·¨¹ÙµÄÒ»·âÐÅ [message #196107] |
Mo, 01 Mai 2006 11:22 |
|
ÉùÔ®ÍõÎÄâù©¤©¤ÃÀ¹úÊÐÃñ¸ø¸Ã°¸·¨¹ÙµÄÒ»·âÐÅ
£¨×÷Õß×¢£ºÎÒÃÇ£¬Ò»ÈºÓÐÁ¼ÖªµÄ£¬³çÉÐÃñÖ÷×ÔÓɵĹ«Ãñ£¬ÌرðºôÓõ¹ú ¼ÊÉç»á¼°¸÷λ¹Ø×¢
ÍõÎÄâùʼþ¼°ÓÉÆäÒý·¢³öÀ´µÄ¡¢Öйú·¨ÂÖ¹¦Ñ§Ô±µÄÈËȨÎÊÌâ¡£ÇëÁªÊð ÉùÔ®ÍõÎÄâùŮʿ£¡
£¡£¡£©
================================================
×𾴵ķ¨¹Ù£º
ÎÒÃÇÊÇÃÀ¹úÊÐÃñ£¬ÎÒÃÇÈÏΪÍõÎÄâùÔÚ4ÔÂ20ÈÕµÄÈËȨ¿¹ÒéÊÇÇå°×µÄ¡£
ÔÚ4ÔÂ20ÈÕ£¬·¨ÂÛ¹¦µÄÐÞÁ¶ÕßÍõÎÄâùÕ¾ÔÚýÌåÅÄÉãËùÔڵĵط½£¬ÓÃÑÔÓ ï¿¹ÒéÖй²ÕþȨ¶Ô
·¨ÂÛ¹¦µÄÆȺ¦¡£¾Í´ËÊ£¬Áª°î¼ì²ì¹ÙÖ¸¿ØÍõÎÄâù¿ÖÏÅ (intimidating)¡¢Ç¿ÆÈ
(coercing)¡¢Íþв (threatening)ºÍɧÈÅ(harassing)Íâ¹ú¹ÙÔ±¡£ÎÒÃÇÈÏΪÕâÖÖÐÐΪÊÇ
²»¹«ÕýµÄ£¬¶øÇÒÎÒÃÇÈÏΪÍõŮʿÊÇÔÚºÏÀíµÄÔËÓÃÃÀ¹úÏÜ·¨Ëù¸³ÓèµÄËý µÄȨÀû¡£
Ê×ÏÈ£¬ÎÒÃÇÈÏΪÕâЩָ¿Ø¼È²»ÊôʵҲ²»¹«Õý¡£ÍõŮʿûÓÐÉ˺¦»òÕß¿Ö ÏŵÄÒâͼ¡£ËýÖ»ÊÇ
Ï£ÍûÓÃÓïÑÔ¿¹ÒéÖй²ÕþȨ²Ù×Ý»òÕßָʹµÄ²»È˵ÀµÄÐÐΪ¡£·Ç³£ÓÐÒâ˼ µÄÊÇËûËù˵µÄ´óÓÐ
¿ÉÄÜÊÇÎÒÃÇÈËÈ˽ÔÖªµÄ£¬È»¶ø²»¸Ò¹«¿ªÖ¸ÔðµÄÊÂʵ¡£´ÓÈκÎÒâÒåÉÏÀ´ ½²£¬Õâ²¢²»ÊÇ¿Ö
ÏÅ¡£Èç¹ûËýÓÐÒâ¿ÖÏÅÖй²ÕþȨÖ÷ϯºú£¬ÄÇôΪʲôËý²»È¥°µÖÐÕÒÒ»¸ö ¸üºÃµÄ»ú»á£¬ÄÇÑù
Ò»À´Ã½ÌåÒ²²»»á·¢ÏÖ£¬¸ü²»»áÒýÀ´ÏÖÔÚµÄÖ¸Ôð¡£ÓëÖ®Ïà·´£¬ÓÉÓÚËüµÄ ÒâͼÔÚÓÚºÍƽ¿¹
Ò飬²¢·Ç¿ÖÏÅÍþв£¬Ëý²Å×÷³ö4ÔÂ20ÈÕµÄÊÂÇé¡£ËýµÄÐÐΪ²»½ö´«´ïÁËÒ »Ë¿Ï£Íû£¬¶øÇÒ½å
»ú»áÏòÃÀ¹ú×Üͳ·¢³öÁËÒ»¸öÐÅÏ¢£ºÏ£Íû²¼Ê²ÒªÇóÖй²ÕþȨֹͣÇÖ·¸ÈË È¨µÄ»î¶¯ºÍÈ«¹úÐÔ
µÄ×Ú½ÌÆȺ¦¡£
Æä´Î£¬ÎÒÃÇÈÏΪÎÒÃÇÓ¦¸Ã´ÓËýµÄ½Ç¶ÈÀ´¿¼ÂÇÕâ¼þÊ£¬ÓÈÆäÊÇ´ÓËýµÄÖ° ÒµºÍ¹ýÈ¥µÄ¾Àú¡£
ÍõŮʿÊÇÒ»ÃûÒ½Éú£¬¶øÇÒËýµÄÖ°ÔðÊǾ¡×î´óŬÁ¦¾ÈÖú×î¶àµÄ²¡ÈË¡£µ« ÊÇ£¬ºóÀ´Ëý·¢ÏÖÖÐ
¹ú·¢ÉúµÄÏÖʵÇé¿öºÍËýµÄ×÷ΪҽÉúµÄµÀµÂÒªÇóºÜ²»Ïà·û¡£
ÔÚÖйú£¬Ðí¶à·¨ÂÛ¹¦ÐÞÁ¶Õß±»Ç¿ÆȸöÈËÒâԸȥ¡°¾èÏס±Æ÷¹Ù£¬Êµ¼ÊÉÏ £¬ÕâЩÆ÷¹Ù±»Âô
È¥£¬»ñÀûÓÚµ±¾Ö¹ÙÔ±¡£Óë·¨ÂÛ¹¦µÄ×øìøµÄƽºÍ±íÏÖÏà·´£¬ÕâÊǶàôÈà ÈËÆø·ß£ºËûÃǽö½ö
ÒòΪÐÞÁ¶·¨ÂÛ¹¦¶øÊܵ½ÆçÊÓÐÔ´ýÓö¡£
ÓÉÓÚËýÊÇÒ»Ãû¾¡Ö°£¬×¨ÒµµÄÒ½Éú£¬Ò»ÖÖ¶ÔÖй²Ö±½Ó²ÎÓëµÄ·ÇÈËÐÔµÄÐРΪµÄ²»ÂúºÜÓпÉÄÜ
ÔÚËýÐÄÖвúÉú¡£Ëý¾ö¶¨½øÐÔÏà¹Øµ÷²é£¬Àúʱ7Äê¡£ËýÔøÎÞÊý´ÎÏòÖй²Ë ¾·¨»ú¹¹ºôÓõ¡£µ«
ÊÇËýµÄŬÁ¦Ò»´ÎҲûÓеõ½»ØÓ¦¡£Òò´Ë£¬Ëý4ÔÂ20ÈյĿ¹ÒéºÜÈÝÒ×ÈÃÈ ËÀí½â£¬ËýµÄÑÔÓï
Àï¼ÐÔÓ×ÅÐÁËáºÍÑÏË࣬ÉõÖÁ¶àÄê»ýÀ۵IJ»ÂúÓë·ßÅ¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬ÕâЩ±íÏÖ ²¢¹¹³É²»Á˶ÔÖй²
ÕþȨÖ÷ϯµÄ¿ÖÏÅÓëÍþв¡£ÒòΪÕâЩÐÐΪֻ²»¹ýÊÇÒ»ÖÖ±í´ï¸öÈ˲»ÂúµÄ ·½Ê½£¬Ò»ÖÖÓÐЧµÄ
·½Ê½¡£
ÔÙÔò£¬ÃÀ¹úÏÜ·¨±£Ö¤¹«ÃñµÄÑÔÂÛ×ÔÓÉ£¬ÏÜ·¨µÚÒ»ÐÞÕý°¸¡°×ڽ̣¬³ö°æ £¬ÑÔÂÛ×ÔÓÉ¡±ÖÐд
µÀ¡°Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances.¡±ÍõŮʿËù×÷µÄÕýÊǺϷ¨µÄ
ÑÔÂÛ×ÔÓÉ¡£ËýµÄ½²ËµºÜÖ±ÂÊ£¬¶øÇÒ¼ò¶Ì£¬½öÓÐ3·ÖÖÓ×óÓÒ¡£ËýµÄ¿¹ÒéÒ ²Ö»ÔÚÓÚÑÔÂÛÖ®¼ä
¶øÒÑ¡£ËýûÓÐʹÓÃÈκδֱ©µÄÑÔÓҲûÓÐʹÓÃÖ«ÌåÉϵı©Á¦¡£Òò´Ë £¬ÕâЩָ¿ØÊÇ´íÎó
µÄ»òÕß²»ºÏÀíµÄ¡£ÎÒÃÇÏàÐÅËýµÄÇå°×¡£
´ÓÁíÒ»¸ö½Ç¶ÈÀ´¿´£¬Õâ¼þ°¸×ӷdz£ÖØÒª£¬Ëû½«»á·´Ó³³öÃÀ¹ú˾·¨»ú¹¹ ÔÚÖй²¶À²ÃͳÖκÍ
ÃÀ¹úÃñÖ÷ÏÜ·¨±£»¤ÏµÄÈËȨ֮¼äµÄÑ¡Ôñ¡£
Öй²ÊÇÒ»¸öÀûÓÿֲÀͳÖεģ¬Î´¾¹ýÈËÃÇÊÚȨµÄ¶À²ÃÕþµ³¡£ ÎÒÃǾªÑȵķ¢ÏÖ£¬Öй²²»
½öÔÚÊÀ½ç¸÷¹úûÓеǼÇ×¢²á,¶øÇÒËüÔÚÖйúҲûÓеǼÇ×¢²á¡£Èç¹û£¬Ò »¸öÖ´Õþµ³Ã»ÓÐÔÚ
Ö´Õþ¹ú¼ÒµÇ¼Ç£¬ÄÇôËüÓÖÔõÑùÄÜ´ú±íÈËÃñ¡£»»¾ä»°Ëµ£¬Öй²ÕþȨÖ÷ϯ Ò²²»ÊÇÒ»¸öºÏ·¨µÄ
Ö÷ϯ¡£
²»½öÈç´Ë£¬Öй²²ÉÈ¡ÁË¿Ö²ÀͳÖιÜÀíÈËÃñ¡£ÔÚ¹ýÈ¥µÄ50ÄêÀ³¬¹ý80 00ÍòÈËËÀÓë·ÇÕý³£
ËÀÍö¡£ÔÚÕâÒ»·½Ã棬Öй²ºÍ¶þսʱµÄÄÉ´âµÂ¹úºÜÏà½ü£¬ËûÃǶ¼Ê¹ÓÃ¿Ö ²ÀͳÖΣ¬²¢ÇÒ¾ªÈË
µÄËÀÍöÈËÊý²úÉúÔÚ¸÷×ÔµÄͳÖÎÆڼ䡣ÍõŮʿµÄÐÐΪÊÇÒ»ÖÖºôÓõÍ£Ö¹ÖÐ ¹²µÄ¿Ö²ÀͳÖΡ£Õâ
ÖÖŬÁ¦ÕýÈçͬÎÒÃÇÔø´ú±íÕýÒå²Î¼ÓµÚ¶þ´ÎÊÀ½ç´óÕ½£¬×èÖ¹µÂ¹úÄÉ´âÕþ ¸®Ò»Ñù·ûºÏÃÀ¹úÏÜ
·¨¾«ÉñºÍÃÀ¹úµÀÒåÁ¼ÖªµÄÐÐΪ¡£
×÷ΪÃÀ¹ú¹«Ãñ£¬ÎÒÃÇÕäϧ±¦¹óµÄÃñÖ÷Öƶȡ£Ëü¸³ÓèÁËÎÒÃÇÊÀ½çÉÏÐí¶à µØ·½»¹´ÓÀ´Ã»Óлú
»áÌåÑé¹ýµÄµÄÈËȨºÍ×ÔÓÉ¡£ÎÒÃǼáÐÅÏÜ·¨ÏµÄÃñÖ÷Öƶȣ¬ÎÒÃǼáÐÅÑÔ ÂÛ×ÔÓɵÄȨÀû£¬Í¬
ʱÎÒÃÇÒ²¶Ô˾·¨»ú¹¹½«ÔÚÍõŮʿ°¸¼þµÄÅоö³äÂúÐÅÐÄ¡£
Sincerely
William.F.Mei
¸½Ó¢ÎÄÔÎÄ£º
Dear Judge:
We are U.S citizens who would like to plead for Mrs.Wang¡¯s innocence who
protested for human rights before white house April 20th.
April 20th, Wang Wenyi, a practitioner of Falun Gong, stood in the area
where all cameramen were assembled and linguistically protested for human
right and persecution of Chinese government over Falun Gong, a spiritual
belief group which was banned and oppressed in China since 1999. And now
federal attorney had accused her of intimidating, coercing, threatening and
harassing foreign public officials. We all think this accusation is
injustice, and sincerely believe that Mrs.Wang was appropriately excising
her nature rights under the constitution of America.
Firstly, we think the accusation is neither true nor justice. Mrs.Wang did
not have the intention of harm nor threatening, instead, she merely
protested verbally against inhuman acts Chinese government had manipulated
or authorized. What is really interesting was the things she protested about
are probably the truth we had all known; however fear not to speak out
publicly. It was not threat in any sense. If she would like to threaten
Chinese President Hu, why did not she find a better chance to do so
privately so that she could avoid public broadcasting and criticizing? On
the contrary, she did exactly the opposite to that because what motivated
her is not the goal of intimidating but peaceably protests. Her acts not
only conveyed a sense of hope but also sent a message to President Bush to
urge Chinese government to stop the violation of human rights and
nation-wide oppression over religious group.
Secondly, we believe we should re-consider this matter from her point of
view also, especially from her career and her past experience. Mrs.Wang is a
doctor, who goal is to save as many people from dying as possible. However,
later she found the reality happened in China does not match her morality as
a doctor.
There happened to many Falun Gong practitioners in China that they were
forced to ¡°donate organs¡± to the government without donor¡¯s permission.
In fact, these organs were sold for personal benefits and usually to be
those public officials. It is outrageous act that how Falun Gong
practitioners were treated with discrimination in contrast to their peaceful
meditation. Since she is a devoted doctor, a sense of animosity probably
arose toward those inhuman acts which the Chinese communist party had
directly involved in. On the basis of her moral sense, she was determined to
embark on a length of 7 year investigation. She had appealed numerous times
to Chinese Judicial System. For the entire endeavor she undertook, she did
not hear anything back from Chinese government. It would be perfectly
understandable that her protest on April 4th was with a sense of bitterness
and gravitas, or even rage and anguish accumulated in the past .However ,by
no means these behaviors could create threatening or intimating to Chinese
President Hu because they are nothing but a way to express personal opinion
of discontent., a efficient way.
Thirdly, the U.S constitution ensures the rights of freedom of speech. The
amendment 1 ¡°freedom of religion, press and expression¡± from U.S
constitution stated ¡°Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances¡±. What
Mrs.Wang did was exactly to exercise freedom of speech; her speech was
explicit and about one minute long. Moreover, she did it peacefully and
verbally only. She did not use any phrases of profane nor cause any violence
physically during her speech. Hence, the accusation seems to be falsified
and void, we believe in her innocence for justice¡¯s sake.
To extent her case in a broader sense ,it¡¯s remarkably important to make a
justice choice on whether the Judicial System of America find the
dictatorship of Chinese Communist Party favorable or the human rights under
the Republic of Democracy more valuable.
Chinese communist party (CCP) was an unauthorized party which dictator over
its people by means of reign of terror. It would be surprising to find out
that CCP not only is a party not registered in countries it had diplomatic
activities with, but also a party not even registered in China, the land it
rules. If it¡¯s not even registered in its own country, how could CCP stand
on behalf of its peoples? In another word, Chinese President Hu is not a
legal president in a sense of the party is not legal.
Also china adopted the reign of terror over its people. In the past 50
years, over 80 millions Chinese were executed or died in other unusual ways.
In that sense, CCP pretty much resembles the Nazi Party of Germany during
the WW2 in terms of reign of terror and the surprisingly high numbers of
people died within its rule. So the act of Mrs. Wang¡¯ protest was part of
the effort to call for stopping the reign of terror in China .And this
effort in turn is a way to demonstrate the spirit of Democracy and human
morality, which also was the reason America fought a war against Nazi during
WW2.
As American citizens, we cherish the precious Democracy which empowers us
human rights which half of the world still had not a chance to take a
glimpse on .We believe in the Democracy under U.S constitution, we believe
in the exercise of freedom of speech, we also believe in the right decision
the Judicial System would make on the case of Mrs.Wang.
Sincerely
William .F.Mei
ÍƼöÐÂÎÅ×飺 nctu.dept.cn
http://groups.google.com/group/tmzhg
http://groups.google.com/group/jpgcd
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 21:06:12 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,02024 Sekunden |
