| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #223751] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 12:16 |
|
Just when America ....
Is outsourcing car-making to China. The Chinese announced
they will be making cars in the USA. Nanjing Automobile Corp
will be making British cars (MG) in Oklahoma, USA. Their plan
was make public by the new CEO of Nanjing Automobile.
Who is an American .... :)
Regards,
Albert K. Fung
Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224066 ] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 20:59 |
|
no wonder !!
PRC is in habit to squander big money for inferior useless techniques,
as buying IBM's notebook factory !!!!
now they are likely to buy useless car industries there !!!
Albert K. Fung wrote:
> Just when America ....
>
> Is outsourcing car-making to China. The Chinese announced
> they will be making cars in the USA. Nanjing Automobile Corp
> will be making British cars (MG) in Oklahoma, USA. Their plan
> was make public by the new CEO of Nanjing Automobile.
>
> Who is an American .... :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Albert K. Fung
> Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
>
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224072 ] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 22:23 |
|
Albert K. Fung wrote:
> Just when America ....
>
> Is outsourcing car-making to China. The Chinese announced
> they will be making cars in the USA. Nanjing Automobile Corp
> will be making British cars (MG) in Oklahoma, USA. Their plan
> was make public by the new CEO of Nanjing Automobile.
MG was never a big seller. A British name may even hinder it more.
For once, I think lecher dog may be right. China may be throwing away
good money for a dream that may not come true any time soon.
>
> Who is an American .... :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Albert K. Fung
> Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224157 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 06:47 |
|
On 12 Jul 2006 13:23:49 -0700, "rst0wxyz [at] yahoo.com"
<rst0wxyz [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>MG was never a big seller. A British name may even hinder it more.
>For once, I think lecher dog may be right. China may be throwing away
>good money for a dream that may not come true any time soon.
There is a method to this madness. Nanjing Automobile Corp had
already bought the production assets of MG_Rover (I recall reading
that somewhere.) The strategy was to acquire the technologies in
suspensions, gearbox transmissions, stuff like that that NJC can
incorporate into their China market cars. This is cheaper and a lot
faster than developing the same systems from scratch.
MG cars will not sell in an already crowded China market. But NAC has
already got all the MG production jigs from the purchase and they are
too big and pricey to use as boat anchors. Therefore why not use them
to make cars in the USA. Sure it will be a loss leader. But it will
not be a total loss as would be the case if NAC went into the US with
a China origin model. By producing and selling MG cars NAC will gain
invaluable experience in operating a car manufacturing facility in the
US. The compoany will also learn marketing, distribution and after
sales support. If the American market doesn't pan out NAC will be out
the investment the factory, much of which is probably subsidized by
Oklahoma State. NAC won't be out much on development and tooling
costs. Sounds good.
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224185 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 09:47 |
|
dream is only you communists' dog !!!
bribery is the chief factor !!!!
rst0wxyz [at] yahoo.com wrote:
> Albert K. Fung wrote:
>
>>Just when America ....
>>
>>Is outsourcing car-making to China. The Chinese announced
>>they will be making cars in the USA. Nanjing Automobile Corp
>>will be making British cars (MG) in Oklahoma, USA. Their plan
>>was make public by the new CEO of Nanjing Automobile.
>
>
> MG was never a big seller. A British name may even hinder it more.
> For once, I think lecher dog may be right. China may be throwing away
> good money for a dream that may not come true any time soon.
>
>
>>Who is an American .... :)
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Albert K. Fung
>>Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
>
>
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224807 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 13:51 |
|
rst0wxyz:
> MG was never a big seller. A British name may even hinder it more.
> For once, I think lecher dog may be right. China may be throwing away
> good money for a dream that may not come true any time soon.
Most gratifying to see ....
That the lecherous gentleman from HK is not as unreadable as
frequently claimed. He, indeed, had made admirable progress.
Regards,
Albert K. Fung
Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224814 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 14:26 |
|
I don't think so !!!!
it is something concern vocabulary.
some topics I learned in english,
some others are daily life ideas.
it is so irregular in chinese english !!!
don't just judge from tiny spot !!!
foreigner may be a little confused, but to chinese, as that rst0wxyz has a
chinese bedmaid-mother, it is not difficult to understand.
such a communists' dog rest0wxyz is just yelling when something he dare not
to understand !!!!
Albert K. Fung wrote:
> rst0wxyz:
>
>
>>MG was never a big seller. A British name may even hinder it more.
>>For once, I think lecher dog may be right. China may be throwing away
>>good money for a dream that may not come true any time soon.
>
>
> Most gratifying to see ....
>
> That the lecherous gentleman from HK is not as unreadable as
> frequently claimed. He, indeed, had made admirable progress.
>
> Regards,
>
> Albert K. Fung
> Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
>
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224866 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 16:52 |
|
lechergod:
> no wonder !!
> PRC is in habit to squander big money for inferior useless techniques,
> as buying IBM's notebook factory !!!!
> now they are likely to buy useless car industries there !!!
Subsidized risk-taking, has its costs .... :)
Regards,
Albert K. Fung
Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224877 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 16:59 |
|
no risk there,
it only costs 1.3 billion mainlanders' sweat and blood to benefit those in
power with bribery !!!!
Albert K. Fung wrote:
> lechergod:
>
>
>>no wonder !!
>>PRC is in habit to squander big money for inferior useless techniques,
>>as buying IBM's notebook factory !!!!
>>now they are likely to buy useless car industries there !!!
>
>
> Subsidized risk-taking, has its costs .... :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Albert K. Fung
> Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
>
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224879 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 17:46 |
|
Albert K. Fung wrote:
> rst0wxyz:
>
> > MG was never a big seller. A British name may even hinder it more.
> > For once, I think lecher dog may be right. China may be throwing away
> > good money for a dream that may not come true any time soon.
>
> Most gratifying to see ....
>
> That the lecherous gentleman from HK is not as unreadable as
> frequently claimed. He, indeed, had made admirable progress.
He is not making "admirable progress". He just cut out some of his
filthy dirty (I said some, not all) foul mouth words. He is
translating his Chinese into English, and looking into the dictionary
to find the right word to fit his Chinese idea. Of course the sentence
(or a bunch of words put together) came out meaningless. Once in a
while, it came out meaningful.
>
> Regards,
>
> Albert K. Fung
> Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224942 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 17:00 |
|
no risk there,
it only costs 1.3 billion mainlanders' sweat and blood to benefit those in
power with bribery !!!!
Albert K. Fung wrote:
> lechergod:
>
>
>>no wonder !!
>>PRC is in habit to squander big money for inferior useless techniques,
>>as buying IBM's notebook factory !!!!
>>now they are likely to buy useless car industries there !!!
>
>
> Subsidized risk-taking, has its costs .... :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Albert K. Fung
> Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
>
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #224960 ] |
Fr, 14 Juli 2006 00:36 |
|
it can confuse foreigner, but not those who can speak chinese !!!
this rst0wxyz is surely having a chinese bedmaid mother and a tortoice
father in PRC mainland. his yelling not understanding is confessing here to
be telling lies !!!
rst0wxyz [at] yahoo.com wrote:
> Albert K. Fung wrote:
>
>>rst0wxyz:
>>
>>
>>>MG was never a big seller. A British name may even hinder it more.
>>>For once, I think lecher dog may be right. China may be throwing away
>>>good money for a dream that may not come true any time soon.
>>
>>Most gratifying to see ....
>>
>>That the lecherous gentleman from HK is not as unreadable as
>>frequently claimed. He, indeed, had made admirable progress.
>
>
> He is not making "admirable progress". He just cut out some of his
> filthy dirty (I said some, not all) foul mouth words. He is
> translating his Chinese into English, and looking into the dictionary
> to find the right word to fit his Chinese idea. Of course the sentence
> (or a bunch of words put together) came out meaningless. Once in a
> while, it came out meaningful.
>
>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Albert K. Fung
>>Montecito/Santa Ysabel, California, USA.
>
>
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
| Re: Reverse outsourcing [message #225047 ] |
Fr, 14 Juli 2006 07:18 |
|
At long bloody last, after three or four years away from the Usenet, I
see good ol' "lechergod" is still around. Anybody here remembers
"AkiraBBQ"?
-Menuet
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news [at] netfront.net
|
|
|
