# #1: Re: Hong Kong's pro democracy disappoints =?Big5?B?tOSqeKXBpUSsow==?=
## Posted on 2012-09-12 21:55:14 by Tak
On 9/10/2012 9:22 AM, ltlee1@hotmail.com wrote:
> http://news.cnyes.com/Content/20120910/KFMPCIA5IXBCM.shtml?c=headline_sitehead
> ------------------
> ç¿ ï¿½xãï¿½Dï¿½ï¼é¸¡pï¿½wæ³ å©ï¿½çGç¿ ï¿½Hãï¿½è¼åz
>
> ï¿½æ·®æµæ¢kÐ«å¡ï¿½|æ¡ï¿½Gï¿½Xï¿½lï¿½Aï¿½xãï¿½Dï¿½ï¼åGãï¿½pï¿½wæ³ï¿½Aã¯Ïï¿½Påï¿½_ãï¿½é©äºçµï¿¥ï¼éWï¿½Uï¿½Cç£ãï¿½Fï¿½vå©ï¿½æª^ï¿½hï¿½Îæå Aï¿½æ·®æ´çï¿½éªï¿½å«Fï¿½vï¿½{é¾èï¿½pï¿½Aç¤ï¿½Mç¬ï¿½nï¿½çç
> ï¿½Dï¿½Aï¿½ï¿½Ïï¿½qï¿½_ãï¿½]ï¿½é¦Aââå¡ï¿½|æ¡ï¿½Gï¿½|é£ï¿½Vï¿½Oï¿½uï¿½C
>
> (æ·éãå¨æ§)
>
> ï¿½æ·®æµæ¢kÐ«å¡ï¿½|ï¿½Aï¿½bç£æ¯ï¿½ævï¿½Tï¿½Uï¿½Aï¿½~ï¿½æwï¿½ç¯xãï¿½Dï¿½ï¼uÎ©è±èµ£ï¿½|ãå²¿ï¿½Aï¿½ï¿½ç¨ï¿½å²oï¿½Mï¿½äºçµï¿¥ï¼éWï¿½Uï¿½Cï¿½Fï¿½vå©ï¿½æª^ï¿½hï¿½Îæå Aï¿½æ·®æ´è¶Fï¿½vï¿½{é¾ï¿½æ°¦æ¾¶è´«æVï¿½Aï¿½]ï¿½æY
> ï¿½Kï¿½Oå¡ï¿½|ï¿½Aï¿½]ï¿½|ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½æ¬·ã@ï¿½]ï¿½å°vï¿½Tï¿½C
>
> ï¿½yï¿½æ·®æµHã¤é¾ï¿½Oï¿½Dï¿½`ï¿½Fï¿½vï¿½{é¾ï¿½Dï¿½qï¿½éª¸AÐ¸ï¿½èsæï¿½Fï¿½vãã¦ï¿½Aâ®ï¿½Hï¿½nï¿½ä¸¹jï¿½æ°¦ï¼Nï¿½æ§Hè®¡ï¿½hï¿½Aã¿ãå¸¸ï¿½Oãï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ççé¶Dï¿½å®³hãï¿½Fï¿½vï¿½Aï¿½ï¿½ï¿½@ã¹Ñå¸ï¿½|è¸ã¿ï¿½_ããï¿½ç¨¹Aï¿½oè´ºè
> çå¸¸ï¿½OÎ¤ï¿½éª¸z
>
> ï¿½|Î¤ï¿½oå¦ï¿½æ±åGï¿½Aï¿½^ï¿½hï¿½ï¿½ï¿½{ï¿½ä¿ºoï¿½Oï¿½æ·®æµHè¸ã¿ï¿½uï¿½@ç£ã¢ï¿½ç¢vï¿½ç¿°{ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½Qï¿½_ãï¿½jï¿½OÑè·ï¿½C
>
> ï¿½yï¿½Lï¿½è¸@ï¿½å°å è¶£@ç£ã¢ï¿½çµOï¿½_ãï¿½fï¿½fÏé¾ãï¿½å Aï¿½Sè¸ã¿ï¿½_ãï¿½zï¿½Lï¿½Uè´ºï¿½Oï¿½qÑè·ï¿½æ·®æ¶æ²ç¨{ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½z
>
> ï¿½^ï¿½hï¿½Î]å¼§ï¿½Aï¿½æ·®æµSï¿½ç½ç» è£^ï¿½Qç¿ ï¿½Hè·ï¿½æ¨ã@Ãã¦ï¿½Oï¿½qï¿½æ¨é¸ï¿½ï¿½Aï¿½]ï¿½å¼ï¿½è·ï¿½é¾è¡æ¶µæ·®æµHã¿ããï¿½èãï¿½ï¿½Aã¤é¾ï¿½]ã¯è±ï¿½bÑå¸ï¿½vï¿½PÑå¸æ¡ï¿½Gï¿½C
> ------------------
>
> "Hong Kongers' apolitical pragmatism, we call as political culture,
> hence those speak a loud voice do not represent the majority, people
> may support western democratic plural politics in their heart,
In other words, those "speak a loud voice" might represent people's
_HEARTS_ ...
> but afraid the ballot box results would anger Beijing, this kind of
> ambivalence is present."
...but not their _VOICES_ .
Btw, I don't think "apolitical pragmatism" is quite the
right word, "political ambivalence" might be better.
Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To takto@alum.mit.eduxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr
Report this message |

# #2: Re: Hong Kong's pro democracy disappoints =?Big5?B?tOSqeKXBpUSsow==?=
## Posted on 2012-09-12 22:41:43 by Tak
On 9/12/2012 5:55 PM, Tak To wrote:
> On 9/10/2012 9:22 AM, ltlee1@hotmail.com wrote:
>> http://news.cnyes.com/Content/20120910/KFMPCIA5IXBCM.shtml?c=headline_sitehead
>> ------------------
>> ç¿ ï¿½xãï¿½Dï¿½ï¼é¸¡pï¿½wæ³ å©ï¿½çGç¿ ï¿½Hãï¿½è¼åz
>>
>> ï¿½æ·®æµæ¢kÐ«å¡ï¿½|æ¡ï¿½Gï¿½Xï¿½lï¿½Aï¿½xãï¿½Dï¿½ï¼åGãï¿½pï¿½wæ³ï¿½Aã¯Ïï¿½Påï¿½_ãï¿½é©äºçµï¿¥ï¼éWï¿½Uï¿½Cç£ãï¿½Fï¿½vå©ï¿½æª^ï¿½hï¿½Îæå Aï¿½æ·®æ´çï¿½éªï¿½å«Fï¿½vï¿½{é¾èï¿½pï¿½Aç¤ï¿½Mç¬ï¿½nï¿½çç
>> ï¿½Dï¿½Aï¿½ï¿½Ïï¿½qï¿½_ãï¿½]ï¿½é¦Aââå¡ï¿½|æ¡ï¿½Gï¿½|é£ï¿½Vï¿½Oï¿½uï¿½C
>>
>> (æ·éãå¨æ§)
>>
>> ï¿½æ·®æµæ¢kÐ«å¡ï¿½|ï¿½Aï¿½bç£æ¯ï¿½ævï¿½Tï¿½Uï¿½Aï¿½~ï¿½æwï¿½ç¯xãï¿½Dï¿½ï¼uÎ©è±èµ£ï¿½|ãå²¿ï¿½Aï¿½ï¿½ç¨ï¿½å²oï¿½Mï¿½äºçµï¿¥ï¼éWï¿½Uï¿½Cï¿½Fï¿½vå©ï¿½æª^ï¿½hï¿½Îæå Aï¿½æ·®æ´è¶Fï¿½vï¿½{é¾ï¿½æ°¦æ¾¶è´«æVï¿½Aï¿½]ï¿½æY
>> ï¿½Kï¿½Oå¡ï¿½|ï¿½Aï¿½]ï¿½|ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½æ¬·ã@ï¿½]ï¿½å°vï¿½Tï¿½C
>>
>> ï¿½yï¿½æ·®æµHã¤é¾ï¿½Oï¿½Dï¿½`ï¿½Fï¿½vï¿½{é¾ï¿½Dï¿½qï¿½éª¸AÐ¸ï¿½èsæï¿½Fï¿½vãã¦ï¿½Aâ®ï¿½Hï¿½nï¿½ä¸¹jï¿½æ°¦ï¼Nï¿½æ§Hè®¡ï¿½hï¿½Aã¿ãå¸¸ï¿½Oãï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ççé¶Dï¿½å®³hãï¿½Fï¿½vï¿½Aï¿½ï¿½ï¿½@ã¹Ñå¸ï¿½|è¸ã¿ï¿½_ããï¿½ç¨¹Aï¿½oè´ºè
>> çå¸¸ï¿½OÎ¤ï¿½éª¸z
>>
>> ï¿½|Î¤ï¿½oå¦ï¿½æ±åGï¿½Aï¿½^ï¿½hï¿½ï¿½ï¿½{ï¿½ä¿ºoï¿½Oï¿½æ·®æµHè¸ã¿ï¿½uï¿½@ç£ã¢ï¿½ç¢vï¿½ç¿°{ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½Qï¿½_ãï¿½jï¿½OÑè·ï¿½C
>>
>> ï¿½yï¿½Lï¿½è¸@ï¿½å°å è¶£@ç£ã¢ï¿½çµOï¿½_ãï¿½fï¿½fÏé¾ãï¿½å Aï¿½Sè¸ã¿ï¿½_ãï¿½zï¿½Lï¿½Uè´ºï¿½Oï¿½qÑè·ï¿½æ·®æ¶æ²ç¨{ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½z
>>
>> ï¿½^ï¿½hï¿½Î]å¼§ï¿½Aï¿½æ·®æµSï¿½ç½ç» è£^ï¿½Qç¿ ï¿½Hè·ï¿½æ¨ã@Ãã¦ï¿½Oï¿½qï¿½æ¨é¸ï¿½ï¿½Aï¿½]ï¿½å¼ï¿½è·ï¿½é¾è¡æ¶µæ·®æµHã¿ããï¿½èãï¿½ï¿½Aã¤é¾ï¿½]ã¯è±ï¿½bÑå¸ï¿½vï¿½PÑå¸æ¡ï¿½Gï¿½C
>> ------------------
>>
>> "Hong Kongers' apolitical pragmatism, we call as political culture,
>> hence those speak a loud voice do not represent the majority, people
>> may support western democratic plural politics in their heart,
>
> In other words, those "speak a loud voice" might represent people's
> _HEARTS_ ...
>
>> but afraid the ballot box results would anger Beijing, this kind of
>> ambivalence is present."
>
> ...but not their _VOICES_ .
>
> Btw, I don't think "apolitical pragmatism" is quite the
> right word, "political ambivalence" might be better.
On a second thought, "political schizophrenia" might be even
better.
Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To takto@alum.mit.eduxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr
Report this message |